Sunday, November 15

How Much of Your Networth Should Be in Stocks? A Practical Guide

How much of your networth should be in stocks? There is no single answer, but age, timeline and risk tolerance give you a sensible range to start from.

Calculator and notes, neutral photo for how much of your networth should be in stocks
Featured image: New Toronto Stock Exchange trading floor by Alexandra Studios, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

How much of your networth should be in stocks? There is no number that suits everyone, but most planners work from a range tied to your age, your timeline and how well you sleep when markets drop. A common starting point is somewhere between 40 and 80 percent for people still saving for retirement, with younger investors toward the higher end. Treat that as a starting point to think from, not a rule. This is general information, not financial advice.

The old rules of thumb

You may have heard that you should hold 100 minus your age in stocks. A 30-year-old would then hold 70 percent. Some updated versions say 110 or 120 minus age, because people now live longer. They are quick shortcuts, and that is both their charm and their flaw. They ignore everything about you except one number.

Another shortcut is the three-fund idea: a total stock market fund, an international fund and a bond fund, split in whatever proportions suit you. It is popular because it is simple and cheap to maintain.

What actually should move your answer

  • Time horizon. Money you need in two years does not belong in stocks. Money you will not touch for 25 years can ride out several bad stretches.
  • Risk tolerance. Not the risk you say you can handle in a quiz, but what you did the last time the market fell by a fifth. If you sold in a panic, you hold too much.
  • Income stability. A tenured teacher with a pension can often take more risk than a freelancer with irregular pay.
  • Emergency cushion. If you have six months of costs in cash, a market fall will hurt less.
  • Debts. Paying off a credit card charging a high rate is often better than chasing market returns.

A worked example

Say someone has a networth of 200,000, made up of a 60,000 home equity stake, 20,000 in cash, 20,000 in a car and belongings, and 100,000 in investment and retirement accounts. When people ask how much of your networth should be in stocks, they often get confused about what to count. Most advisors apply the percentage to investable assets, meaning the portfolio, not the house or the car. In this case the stock share of that 100,000 might be 70,000 to 80,000 for someone in their thirties, which is only about a third to 40 percent of total networth.

That difference matters. If you apply 70 percent to your whole networth including your home, you would end up with an odd and risky portfolio.

Do not forget the rest of your life

Your home, your career and any business you own are already bets on the economy. If you work in the technology sector and also hold only technology shares, you are heavily concentrated. A market downturn could reduce your job security and your investments in the same year. Spreading across industries and countries helps with that.

Rebalancing is the other quiet job. If stocks grow faster than your bonds, your mix drifts. Many people review once a year and move back to their target, which forces a mild habit of selling high and buying low.

When to ask for help

If you have a complicated situation, such as stock options from an employer, an inheritance, a business sale or approaching retirement, a fee-only financial planner can be worth the cost. Ask how they are paid. Avoid anyone who promises returns, because nobody can.

The takeaway

The answer to how much of your networth should be in stocks begins with your timeline, then your temperament, then your finances overall. Pick a range you can stick to through a crash, apply it to your investable assets, and revisit it once a year or after a big life change. Boring and consistent tends to beat clever and anxious.

This is general information, not financial advice.

Common mistakes with how much of your networth should be in stocks

The first is counting your home. The second is copying a friend’s allocation without knowing their timeline. The third, and most expensive, is changing course at the worst moment. Plenty of investors who said they were aggressive sold after a sharp fall, locked in the loss, and missed the recovery. If that sounds like you, a calmer mix with a bit more in bonds may earn you more over time simply because you will keep it.

A useful test is to imagine your stock holdings dropping by a third in a year. Would you still contribute to your accounts and stay put? If the honest answer is no, lower your stock share until the answer becomes yes.

Also keep in mind the answer to how much of your networth should be in stocks will change as you age. Many people shift gradually toward bonds and cash as retirement approaches, and target-date funds do that automatically. They are not perfect, but they are a sensible default for people who do not want to manage it themselves. Check fees, because they vary more than you would expect.

This is general information, not financial advice.

For background, the Asset allocation article on Wikipedia is a useful starting point.

Related reading: High Net Worth Interest Rates: What Affluent Clients Get · List of High Networth Individuals: Who Counts and Who Tracks

Photo of invisionfree