Monday, November 2

Why Relationships Still Decide Who Gets Funded in Venture Capital

Two people shaking hands after an investor meeting about venture capital relationships
Image: Leonard J. DeFrancisci / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

Ask ten founders how they landed their first check and at least seven will start the story with a person. A former colleague who made an email introduction. A fellow founder who vouched for them. Someone they met at a dinner who remembered them three months later. The pitch deck came after. That is the quiet power of venture capital relationships.

This is awkward for an industry that likes to describe itself as a meritocracy of ideas. Funds are more numerous than they used to be, deal data is easier to search, and founders can find investor email addresses in a minute. And yet the old pattern persists. Venture capital relationships still do a great deal of the work.

Venture capital relationships - Two people shaking hands after an investor meeting about venture capital relatio
Image: Web Summit / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0

Why venture capital relationships beat information

Early-stage investing is decision-making under extreme uncertainty. A company with a prototype and a few customers has almost no track record to evaluate. That is the heart of venture capital: betting on people before the numbers exist. Revenue is tiny, the market is unproven, and the team may be two people. An investor can’t audit their way to confidence, so they look for proxies.

A warm introduction from someone the investor respects is one of the best proxies available. It says that a person with something to lose has looked at this founder and is willing to put their own credibility behind a message. Cold emails can work, but they arrive without that signal, and the investor has to do all the filtering alone.

Picture two emails landing on the same morning. One is a stranger’s cold note. The other is a forward from a founder the investor backed two years ago, with one line: “worth twenty minutes.” Everyone knows which opens first. There’s also a practical point. Investors see an enormous number of pitches. A trusted referral solves a basic triage problem: which of these thousand messages deserves an hour?

The investor’s side of venture capital relationships

Venture capital relationships matter for investors too, and not just for finding deals. A fund’s network affects three things.

  • Access. Hot rounds fill quickly. Investors who are known and liked by founders get a call before the round is announced.
  • Judgment. Calling a few people who’ve worked with a founder before is a cheap and powerful form of diligence.
  • Value after the check. Introductions to early customers, hires and later-stage investors are often the most useful thing a small fund can offer.

This is why smaller, specialized funds can compete with large ones. A firm that deeply knows one community, whether it’s a region, a technical field or a group of operators from the same former company, can see deals the big names hear about late.

The downside of relying on venture capital relationships

None of this is purely healthy. When access depends on who you know, people without the right connections are shut out, regardless of the quality of their ideas. Studies and anecdotes over the years have pointed to uneven funding patterns across gender, geography and background, and relationship-driven sourcing is widely considered one reason. The same dynamics appear elsewhere, as in the question of whether a famous deal tells you anything real about a founder, covered in Shark Tank deals and founder net worth.

Some funds respond by deliberately widening their search: open application forms, scouts in underrepresented communities, programs for first-time founders. These efforts vary in quality, but the direction is sensible. If good ideas are spread evenly across the population and capital isn’t, there’s money left on the table.

What founders can do about it

If you don’t have venture capital relationships yet, you can still build them. It takes time, though, so start before you need money.

Make yourself easy to vouch for

People introduce founders they can describe in one sentence. Be clear about what you’re building and for whom, and send a short forwardable blurb, not a long attachment.

Work the second ring

Your direct contacts may not know investors, but they know people who do. Ask for advice rather than money. Advice requests get answered, and the recommendation to talk to someone else often follows naturally.

Give before you ask

Share useful information, help other founders, and be a reliable reference. Strong venture capital relationships are built over years of small favors, not one clever pitch. Reputations in small communities travel faster than any announcement.

Show progress between conversations

When you stay in touch with an investor who passed, a short update with real movement, such as a new customer or a shipped feature, turns a no for now into a warmer second look.

Write an introduction people can forward

Keep the blurb to a few lines: what you build, who it is for, one proof point, and what you are asking for. A busy investor will forward something short, and a forwarded note carries the sender’s name with it. Some professionals even act as go-betweens for talent, an arrangement described in do software engineers need an agent.

Don’t ignore cold outreach

It’s a lower-probability route, but it isn’t dead. Specific, brief and well-researched messages get read. Generic mass emails don’t.

The longer view on venture capital relationships

Tools will keep improving how investors find companies, but venture capital relationships will keep deciding who gets the second meeting. and that will help at the margins. But money for unproven things will always depend on judgment about people, and judgment is built through repeated contact. The most durable advantage in this business is probably not secret data. It’s being the person others call first, because over the years you were honest, quick and useful.

Image: Leonard J. DeFrancisci / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.