Monday, November 2

Why Some Retailers Are Slow to Accept Apple Pay and Google Pay

Tap-to-pay with a phone is common, yet some big retailers hold out. Learn the business reasons behind it: fees, rival wallets, data and terminal upgrades.

Customer tapping a phone with mobile wallets at a store checkout
Photo: Lhzss8 / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

You hold your phone over the reader, wait, and nothing happens. The cashier shrugs, and you dig a plastic card out of your pocket like it is 2005. For years, a few of the biggest retailers declined to accept mobile wallets, even though the technology was mature and the hardware was often sitting right there. The cause is mostly money, control and strategy, not engineering.

Customer tapping a phone with mobile wallets at a store checkout

How tapping to pay with mobile wallets works

When you tap, your wallet does not send your real card number. It sends a one-time code called a token. The terminal passes the token to the payment network, which converts it back, then approves or declines the purchase. It is fast, and it is safer than swiping, because a stolen token is useless on its own.

The terminal needs near-field communication, or NFC, and the retailer’s payment software must be set up to accept these tokens. Many modern terminals already include the hardware. Switching on mobile wallets is mostly a matter of settings, testing and signed agreements. In other words, a store can own capable terminals for years and still leave the feature turned off.

Reason one and two: fees and a rival app

Every card payment costs the merchant a fee, split between the bank that issued the card, the network and the processor. Large retailers negotiate hard on these costs, because tiny differences multiply into huge sums at their volume.

Mobile wallets usually run on the same card networks, so the basic fees look similar to a plastic card. But retailers worry about new middlemen taking a slice over time, and about terms in agreements with the wallet providers. Some were unwilling to sign conditions they felt weakened their bargaining power.

Then there is the rival app. Several big chains built their own payment apps, often linked straight to a customer’s bank account or a stored balance, which can cut card fees. Those apps also hold loyalty points, coupons, receipts and purchase history. Accepting other mobile wallets at the same terminal means competing with an option already built into every phone, and a retailer that spent heavily on its own app had little reason to hand customers an easier alternative. Picture a grocery chain whose app stores your points and pays from your bank account. Every tap on a phone wallet is a payment that skips that app, and with it the points, the coupons and the habit.

Reason three and four: data and terminal costs

Payment data is valuable. A store’s own app shows exactly what you bought, when and where, tied to your account. A payment through mobile wallets gives the retailer far less personal information, since the token hides the card details. For companies that earn money from analysing shoppers and selling advertising, that is a real loss. The same token that protects you from fraud also keeps the store from learning as much about you.

The last reason is plain cost and effort. Upgrading thousands of stores is not trivial. Terminals must be certified, staff trained and systems tested. If a chain already has a working setup, it may wait for a scheduled refresh. Franchise operators and smaller chains face extra complications when each store has a different owner, because a decision at headquarters still has to be adopted, paid for and tested location by location. A change that sounds like a quick switch can take a year.

Why retailers finally accept mobile wallets

Customer pressure is the strongest force. When shoppers keep asking why they cannot tap, and when they drift to competitors who accept it, holding out gets expensive. Speed matters as well, and mobile wallets shave seconds off every sale, because contactless payments are quicker and keep queues moving. The pandemic pushed many people to avoid touching terminals and cash, which sped up demand.

The economics also improve. Fraud tends to be lower with tokenised payments, and chargebacks can fall. As mobile wallets become the default way many people pay, a store’s own app has to compete for attention in a world where most customers simply tap.

What it means for you

If a store does not take your wallet, a few simple habits help:

  • Keep a physical card as a backup.
  • Check whether the retailer’s own app offers discounts that make it worth using.
  • Look for the contactless symbol on the terminal. Some accept contactless cards but not phones, though this is rare.
  • Remember that your wallet still works online and in many other shops.

Whatever you use, basic security matters. Set a passcode or biometric lock, keep your software updated and review your statements. If you lose your phone, you can usually suspend the cards in your mobile wallets remotely.

When a major chain finally switches on mobile wallets, it is rarely a technical breakthrough. It is the end of a long negotiation over fees, data and customer loyalty. Banks, networks, phone makers and retailers each want to own the relationship with the customer, and convenience for the shopper tends to arrive only when those interests line up or public demand gets too loud to ignore. For the technical side, the Wikipedia article on near-field communication is a useful primer. The result for shoppers is simple: faster checkouts and one more place where the phone replaces the wallet in your pocket.

Related reading: Digital Wallets for AI Agents: How Machine Payments Could Work and Command-Line Coding Agents: What They Do and How to Use Them Safely.