Title: 12. CD length
Conway - May 25, 2009 08:03 AM (GMT)
Please place any comments below.
elvischomsky - May 25, 2009 09:28 AM (GMT)
otherdave - May 25, 2009 06:36 PM (GMT)
48. I was going to say 47. Damn.
Mere Pseud. - May 25, 2009 10:25 PM (GMT)
50 minutes. Now for what category does this qualify? :confused:
Buy Kurious! - May 26, 2009 10:52 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (elvischomsky @ May 25 2009, 09:28 AM) |
| 47 minutes. |
...and 38 seconds.
Drjohnrock - June 1, 2009 01:38 AM (GMT)
I hope it stays under 50 minutes, which was the norm for most LPs during the Stupendous Fall Era of '83-'85 when Brix was first with the gruppe.
Conway - June 2, 2009 11:01 AM (GMT)
51:48. Just remember I picked it here first!
REX - June 11, 2009 12:29 AM (GMT)
This one will be short and fast, with no extended workouts (like "Reformation") or experiments (like "Bonkers" or "Das Boat"). 35-40 minutes.
Völlïg Tötäll - June 24, 2009 12:15 AM (GMT)
35-40 minutes, hopefully. My hemorrhoids wouldn't allow me to sit down longer. :(
RepoMan - July 8, 2009 06:30 PM (GMT)
40-45 minutes would be good.
Anything over 52 is too long.
DeusErac - July 21, 2009 02:52 PM (GMT)
62 minutes, with at least one track over 10
flickeringlexicon - November 7, 2009 04:53 PM (GMT)
79:59
Value for money, don't ya know... :)
dj hollerbusch - December 20, 2010 06:56 PM (GMT)
