Title: 07. Vinyl contents
Conway - May 25, 2009 07:57 AM (GMT)
Please place any comments below.
Exopsychicton - May 26, 2009 08:48 PM (GMT)
Why bother otherwise? Double 180g with at least one alternate version and/or track.
Buy Kurious! - May 26, 2009 08:48 PM (GMT)
No differences.
When was the last time a vinyl release differed from the CD one?
Buy Kurious! - May 26, 2009 08:49 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Exopsychicton @ May 26 2009, 08:48 PM) |
| Why bother otherwise? |
Better sound? :unsure:
Howard - May 26, 2009 11:34 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Buy Kurious! @ May 26 2009, 08:48 PM) |
No differences.
When was the last time a vinyl release differed from the CD one? |
Reformation.
Buy Kurious! - May 27, 2009 07:09 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Howard @ May 26 2009, 11:34 PM) |
| QUOTE (Buy Kurious! @ May 26 2009, 08:48 PM) | No differences.
When was the last time a vinyl release differed from the CD one? |
Reformation.
|
So it was! Blimey, I didn't know that.
Hmm, it's more likely than I thought, then...
Drjohnrock - June 1, 2009 01:30 AM (GMT)
The CD will probably have extra tracks, as did later CD reissues of PBL, TWAFWOTF and TNSG, which originally came out during '83-'85, when Brix was first with the band.
Conway - June 2, 2009 10:52 AM (GMT)
Exactly the same as the CD, I reckon.
REX - June 11, 2009 12:18 AM (GMT)
RepoMan - July 8, 2009 06:20 PM (GMT)
I've always hated different formats having different contents. It's designed to rip people off, so I'd hope all the formats are the same.
aumgn - November 16, 2009 01:16 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Buy Kurious! @ May 27 2009, 08:49 AM) |
| QUOTE (Exopsychicton @ May 26 2009, 08:48 PM) | | Why bother otherwise? |
Better sound? :unsure:
|
If it was recorded in analogue, that would be true. Otherwise the only advantage of vinyl is it's got a bigger area to use for artwork and the wee crackle at the beginning gives you a nice warm fuzzy feeling inside. :P
dj hollerbusch - December 20, 2010 06:51 PM (GMT)
