View Full Version: Missing Forum Sections

Star Trek Chat Forums > Suggestions, Feedback, and Questions > Missing Forum Sections


Title: Missing Forum Sections
Description: According to google cache


Kas - September 27, 2004 04:15 AM (GMT)
The Game Zone is missing still.. (It was fun too!)
Star Wars
Stargate SG-1
My Site.com
Any kind of gaming


These are the main ones that i noticed where gone..


Kas - September 28, 2004 01:33 AM (GMT)
Could we please please please have the game zone section back? The word games and that were fun :)
And i think my site.com was good as well some people here had some nice websites :)

Seth - September 28, 2004 09:21 PM (GMT)
Here's what I don't get. you guys claim you're in the right and doing the "just" thing when infact you're acting like kids. YOu're harrasing the people here, you're spamming the boards, you guys got it all deleted. What's up? Just move on already.

Natima Lang - September 28, 2004 09:32 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Guest -CAPTAIN MIKE - Guest @ Sep 28 2004, 02:35 PM)
Why have you stayed here Kes, I thought you were loyal to Me, Matrix and the other members...same with you Natima, I also thought you had more sense and respect.

BTW: Hey MT, IP Bans don't work that well on me.

Captain Mike--

I expected fully that you were going to mention this as soon as I withdrew my support, and I did not change my position without due consideration. My sense and respect goes beyond respect for a single individual, to a respect for principles.

I thought long and hard before I changed, and that was why I asked Kas to present her evidence to me instead of jumping to a conclusion. When I looked at what was going on with TNZ, and added that with the e-mail I received from you, a clear pattern emerged that fit what she was saying.

In most cases I feel that once support is given to someone, it should stay with them--unless an ethical violation is found. And that's what I feel that I found...a breach in ethics that I could not tolerate.

I should add that you are not helping anybody to trust you by essentially challenging MT to try to ban you effectively. If my trust for you had already been eroded by what I've already seen in your conduct, what do you think it is now? Do you think that I am somehow now more likely to give my support back to you? I do not think so. This behavior of yours does not do anything to rebuild trust, to rebuild your character in our eyes.

--Natima Lang


P.S.: I can see that you have brought others, such as Admiral Spock, into your plans to disrupt this forum. This further disappoints me, and strengthens my conviction that I did the right thing in changing my position. To feel the need, just because you have personally lost something, that you must destroy it for everyone else is perhaps the MOST immature course of action possible.

Capt. Mike - September 28, 2004 09:46 PM (GMT)
Wow, I am pretty dumb.

Natima Lang - September 28, 2004 10:05 PM (GMT)
Your response does nothing to prove wrong a single point that I have made in these posts, and further undermines your character.

I have tried to keep my comments focused upon the actual behavior that I have observed from you. That is what I have based all of my decisions and posts on.

What you have done, however, is to resort to an ad hominem attack--in this case a particularly unsophisticated form of it...name-calling. You are only digging yourself in deeper by engaging in that sort of thing. You are contributing to my case against you rather than detracting--you're just handing me more evidence.

mt2 - September 28, 2004 10:45 PM (GMT)
I've made the updates to all the forums that require them, and extended the rules on a few. I think it's better to limit the amout of forums we have, thus, just allowing a more diverse set of topics in one is a good solution.

As this is solved, and is already getting off course, I'll go ahead and lock it. If you feel the need to open more forums, just start a new topic please.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree