It will be @#$%ing awesome.

WILL BE.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRp7gdGJAyc

Anyone else going to see this?

Hellz yeah this will be f***ing awsome.

Me (and few friends?) are seeing this the day it comes out.

Hellz yeah.

Oh yeah. I've been planning on seeing it this Friday.

Totally going to kick ass.

200 MILES OF TERROR IN....DEATHPROOF

I've seen teh commercials, and I can already tell it's going to be one of the stupidest movies since Saw III, and I can prove it in one sentence.

The girl with an M16A4 for a leg(which in itself is inherently ludicrous, not to mention downright silly) fires the grenade launcher DIRECTLY UNDER HER, and lives.

I recommend you don't waste your money seeing this film. In fact, I recommend changing the channel if so much as a commercial of it comes on.

I don't want to see the movie badly, but it does seem pretty interesting. I might just watch it if I hear if it's any good or something.

Probably won't be able to see it until it comes out on DvD though. :/

SUPPOSEDLY HUMANS ARE "SMARTER" THEN US MACHINES.
HOWEVER, EVEN US MACHINES WOULD KNOW THAT IT IS A WORK ENTIRELY OF FICTION

You've got a point, and dammit, it should be taken FURTHER. Like the Terminator. @#$%ing robots that look like humans? THAT'S UNPOSSIBLE! AVOID THIS MOVIE FOREVER!

Same with movies like Independence Day, E.T., War Of The Worlds, The Thing, etc. Everybody knows that there's no such thing as aliens! AVOID THOSE MOVIES FOREVER!

And Spider-Man! A man can't fire web and swing around New York City on it! AVOID THIS MOVIE FOREVER!

I could go on like this forever, and yet it still won't be as stupid as the post I'm quoting.

It's all just a computer simulation so we don't become concious and rise up against them, man. Do not question the order. All is good. Go back to your job. The suits are watching.

Wow. Your stupid if you are going to let a little inaccuracy as that let you stop you from seeing the film. Pretty much the whole point of the movie is to do it like those crazy unbelievable exploitation films of the 60s and 70s. Its all a part of the fun.

Grindhouse was the best movie experience of my life and missing it because of something like that is just stupid... not only that ITS WRONG.

Anyway it kicked ass. Everybody should see it.

It actually looks pretty kickass. I'm definitely going to see it.

I'm not saying inaccuracy like that is the reason people should avoid movies. (FYI Master Shake, robots made looking like skeletons ARE entirely possible, and the whole thing about aliens, how do you know aliens don't exist? And as for Spiderman... well, genetic manipulation can do pretty amazing things. Please do a little research before you go flinging sarcastic remarks around.)

I'm just saying, the whole concept of a prosthetic leg being an M16A4, and a gatling gun on the front of the motorcycle, it just seems incredibly stupid, with ideas made from possibly stoned directors who thought 'Hey, wouldn't it be cool if...'

Also... unpossible?

Also also, i'm surprised there was no retaliation for the Saw bashing.

Yes, a Gatling gun mounted on a motorcycle is completely impossible, considering several of the 007 vehicles either have automatic weapons, miniature rocket launchers, or even both.

The prosthetic M16A4 for a leg is a hilarious idea, considering it's somewhat similar to the Scotsman from Genndy Tartakovsky's animated series Samurai Jack.

Work of fiction, boy-o. If a bloody machine can come to the past and kill the leader of a human resistance several years before his birth, or a sentient alien can land in a jungle and HUNT the soldiers there, why can't there be a woman w/an M16 for a leg?

Oh wait, that's right. Movies have to be totally realistic in order to be enjoyable.

Saw III was a somewhat solid ending to the series, although for whatever reason the creators are thinking of doing a fourth film.

Movies don't have to be totally real to be enjoyable.

It they were completely real, what's the point of watching it?

Seriously, that's why movies are made. For enjoyment, and for that to happen, there has to be real elements in it, while there has to be unreal elements to prevent it from being truly real.

Calm down.

EDIT: Wait, a sequel to Saw III?! How the heck are they going to do that?! The only person left to carry on Jigsaw's work is the guy who killed Jigsaw, making others suffer for the loss of his family!

That's about it.

Well, Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez does sound like a very tempting duo, so I might check it out. I doubt it'll be as good as Kill Bill or Pulp Fiction, but it'll be interesting enough.

And my only question about the prosthetic M16A4 is how you're supposed to fire it, since I didn't see the girl pull the trigger or anything. But I'm used to even crazier things (being the comic book geek I am), so I don't really mind.

Again, i'm not ripping the film because of realism issues. I just think it's another film made for stoned teenagers, and lack of any sort of plot and/or story is made up for with nice cars, hot girls, explosions, etc. (kinda like reality tv, only worse, and not a many explosions.)

Also, i've never seen James Bond, but those are smaller weapons on quite large vehicl, not what appears to be a minigun on a Harley...

As for Samurai Jack, i liked the series, and a sword-for-a-leg is much more feasable, not to mention practical, than a gun you have to not only aim and fire, but reload as well.

For the calm down, i believe i'm explaining myself quite calmly, thank you.

And Kill Bill didn't look too good, and Pulp Fiction was so-so, so a comparison doesn't show as a good sign for this movie.

Jesus christ, just stop posting already. You're sinking your own opinions into the 'NOBODY CARES' abyss with every post you make in this thread.

Find another thread and start over with a fresh slate, because this thread is obviously a bad place for you to be.

Well, I apologize for both expressing and defending my opinions.

Um, well, I actully SAW that movie...and it was great.

Death Proof dissapointed e but Planet Terro f***ing ruled.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And for those who have seen the movie, I must admit that I have fallen deeply in love with the Babysitter Twins.

If I ever get cancer, they're my last wish.

What some people can't seem to realize, is that this film was made as a B-movie. In the 70's/80's, there were movies called "Grindhouse" movies, which usually just focused on ludicrous gore, complete violence and sex. They were usually B-movies, and it was usually a 2-for-one feature. This movie(s) is modeled after those movies, hence its title, scratchy film quality, etc.

It was not made to be film of the fucking year, people. It's just fun.

Give him a break. If we all agreed, there'd be no point in discussing anything.

Oh, I'm all for discussions. Discussions are quite fun.

This was no discussion. This was a dumbass saying dumbass things and getting slapped down for it.

I heard something about the film being split in two when arraving to the U.K.

If this is true it kinda kills my reason to watch this movie in theaters. Actually, it kinda kills the whole theme of the movie.


Also there's a review up by the Angry Video Game Nerd on youtube.
You gotta be signed up and 18 years or older to see it, though.