View Full Version: New repeal at vote

NS Canada Old Forum > Current UN Poll > New repeal at vote


Title: New repeal at vote
Description: 'Ban whaling'


Carbanousa - May 3, 2007 08:14 AM (GMT)
There is currently a repeal motion at vote in th United Nations. The vote will repeal the resolution 'ban whaling'. The attached poll will be open until Friday May 4th when I will cast my vote based on the result of this poll. Please remember that you can only vote once, no matter how many offsite accounts or or nations in Canada you may have.
Category: Repeal

Resolution: #70
Proposed by: WhaleCo Global LLC

Description: UN Resolution #70: Banning whaling (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: All Businesses) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: 1): NOTING the passage of United Nations Resolution #119, UNCoESB;

2): FURTHER NOTING article 7 of UNCoESB which bans all hunting of endangered species, in addition to other provisions which ensure the survival of endangered species;

3): EXPRESSING its gratitude for the protection granted by Resolution #70 in the intermediate period before the passage of Resolution #119;

4): CONVINCED that Resolution #70 is rendered redundant by the protections provided in Resolution #119;

5): BELIEVING that the removal of unnecessary legislation is in the best interests of the member nations of the UN;

6): THE UNITED NATIONS hereby repeals United Nations Resolution #70, Banning whaling.

The current vote stands at 4,930 for to 4,285 against.

Almonaster - May 3, 2007 12:03 PM (GMT)
Having had a look at #119, I don't think it is a satisfactory substitute.


BabyPanda - May 3, 2007 06:29 PM (GMT)
And fwor the rest of us who wish to read the cited resolution 119, it is bwelow.

QUOTE
UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTION #119
UNCoESB
A resolution to increase the quality of the world’s environment, at the expense of industry.
Category:  Environmental  Industry Affected:  All Businesses  Proposed By:  Venerable Libertarians

In these times of Population growth expanding into environmentally sensitive areas of the NS world, with natural habitats being encroached. With over fishing and hunting of game running unchecked, a side effect is the ever greater numbers of animals on the brink of extinction. It is with these concerns we enact the United Nations Conservation of Endangered Species Bill, UNCoESB

Article 1: The Executive.

On ratification by the General Assembly, the UN shall set up an executive body to monitor NS World wildlife numbers. The Executive shall decide what numbers apply to each level of animal population and what Species receive the title "Endangered" and the protections the title affords. The Executive shall control funding and see it is used where it is most required.

Article 2: Quotas.

International best practise should be adopted in forming quotas and heavy penalties should be applied if these quotas are broken. Imposition of quotas should ensure that total bans on fisheries or game hunting of a specific species should be a rare event.

Article 3: Education.

National governments are charged with educating local populations in the benefits of conservation of species that are heavily hunted within their national boundaries.

Article 4: Species of National Importance.

Where there are species regarded with a sense of national importance, National governments may apply conservation orders on that species within its own national boundaries and impose national restrictions to hunting of that species. These restrictions shall only apply within the National boundary and are not applicable to neighbouring Nations unless an agreement has been set by the neighbouring countries. National Governments may set penalties for breaches of these national conservation orders.

Article 5: Monitoring

The UN in conjunction with National and Regional Governments, Non Governmental Organisations and Environmental agencies shall constantly monitor closely wildlife numbers in their area of concern. These numbers shall be tallied yearly so they may show increases or decreases in the numbers of wildlife. If considerable decrease or a recurring trend of decrease in population is noted local conservation attempts shall be instituted at a national level aided by local populations and national agencies.

Article 6: Capture and Breeding.

If local populations decrease to a worrying level then local Zoological and Marine specialists shall step in to capture and breed, in an attempt to reverse the decrease in numbers. Also, if larger populations of the same animal exist in another part of the NS world steps should be taken to introduce new blood lines to the endangered species. Local Bans shall be instituted on hunting of the endangered animal until such time as it is deemed safe to do so. Quotas shall then be applied to the hunting of the recovering species.

Article 7: Full Escalation.

Where a Species of animal has come dangerously close to world extinction levels, The UN shall impose a Full escalation of Protection to the species. All hunting of the species shall be expressly forbidden. Full funding shall be granted for the escalation of steps to conserve the species and to rebuild its population to an acceptable level for the species to recover. Criminal charges shall be brought against any individual or group in contravention to this.

We hereby enact the UNCoESB.

The Author wishes to thank the Nation of “Yeldan UN Mission” whose assistance has been invaluable.

    Votes For: 9,396    Votes Against: 4,503    Implemented: Fri Sep 2 2005


Also, the Author of 119 on current resolution

QUOTE
"the UNCoESB was introduced as a one for all to replace the multitude of save the (insert your fluffy critter here) resolutions. It was designed primarily to protect all species of wild life on this planet and the focus of the UNCoESB is ecological conservation of species through education and the application of decent practices in hunting and fishing. It is designed to preserve the rights of indigenous peoples to continue to practice their time honoured traditions and I will add that any nation may through the terms of the UNCoESB specify any species for specialised protections within that nations borders.

The simple fact is that this whales resolution is redundant. It has for too long cost our nations in UN Fees that need not be applied for the whales get sufficient protections through the UNCoESB resolution. It is high time to lessen the unnecessary financial burden on our members and repeal this redundant resolution.

I thank you all for your time."

Lord Byron, author of the UNCoESB resolution retakes his seat to await responses to his petition.


BP, as usual, doesn't vote.

Carbanousa - May 3, 2007 11:59 PM (GMT)
Thanks BP. Have some sweets :) (don't tell Mav though - it's our secret ;)).

BabyPanda - May 4, 2007 02:59 AM (GMT)
YAY! *giggle* sweet sweets!

mavenu - May 4, 2007 10:17 PM (GMT)
The resolution Repeal "Banning whaling" was passed 6,209 votes to 5,893.

Almonaster - May 4, 2007 10:49 PM (GMT)
Rats




Hosted for free by InvisionFree