Gore and Baird at Conflict

Criticizing Gore's environmental record in office is not an admissible defense. That has no relevance to quality of the plan. That seems to be the only rebuttal that Baird offers, according to that article. Ad hominem.

anyone figure out how that kerfuffle over Gore's house resolved itself? i stopped observing it.

My real comment is that Suzuki's the guest editior of the vancouver sun (vancouversun.com) this weekend. should be an interesting paper to read :P


(oooohh...there's a 8 minute clip about Baird defending it...i can't watch it til friday....anyone give me the giest? dum dialup....)

You mean the bit about his house using twenty times the energy of an average house? According to the Snopes article about it, there are pretty much two sides to it--yes, Gore's house uses a lot of energy but there's some mitigating factors. Draw your own confusion.