Title: Shining God Ms
jjang - February 28, 2005 04:50 AM (GMT)
Beholder updated his site!
Kai - February 28, 2005 12:46 PM (GMT)
I really want the CWD.
It sounds really good.
Bla-De-Stroyer - February 28, 2005 09:17 PM (GMT)
Yeah *drools of God Ring* It's the best part you can get of this blade. ^^
Yukiya - March 1, 2005 10:43 AM (GMT)
I thought Beholder didn't allow people linking to his site. >.<
Zer0 KamiKazi - March 1, 2005 10:37 PM (GMT)
I want the attack ring for collection.
Mihaeru - March 2, 2005 01:48 AM (GMT)
Samurai Upper
God Ring
Bearing Core 2
I can't wait to test this out.
Kai - March 2, 2005 02:04 AM (GMT)
That sounds like a pretty cool custom Antoniazzi.
Also,try it with Metal Change Core and maybe Bearing Core.
Zer0 KamiKazi - March 7, 2005 11:30 PM (GMT)
God Ring looks like a very good part.Is its plastic part the heaviest so far?
Dragoon X - March 10, 2005 12:26 AM (GMT)
I'm not entirely sure, Zero. Anyway, I am somewhat disappointed with this blade. Sure, the CWD God Ring is very useful in battle, but the AR and RC are completely useless. Takara could've given it's AR a whole new design.
Kai - March 10, 2005 01:29 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Dragoon X @ Mar 10 2005, 12:26 AM) |
| I'm not entirely sure, Zero. Anyway, I am somewhat disappointed with this blade. Sure, the CWD God Ring is very useful in battle, but the AR and RC are completely useless. Takara could've given it's AR a whole new design. |
Yes,but for people who like the attack rings design will be happy with the attack ring because it is the most offensive version of that metal frame.
Dragoon X - March 10, 2005 01:36 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Flamin Kai @ Mar 9 2005, 07:29 PM) |
| QUOTE (Dragoon X @ Mar 10 2005, 12:26 AM) | | I'm not entirely sure, Zero. Anyway, I am somewhat disappointed with this blade. Sure, the CWD God Ring is very useful in battle, but the AR and RC are completely useless. Takara could've given it's AR a whole new design. |
Yes,but for people who like the attack rings design will be happy with the attack ring because it is the most offensive version of that metal frame.
|
Yes, that is true, but think about it for a second. Do you really want to see recopies of an old design. Other blades with that same design would work just as well, and be just as effective. All I am saying is that Takara could've come up with a much different design.
Tamer Brad - March 10, 2005 08:19 AM (GMT)
Nobody complained when they re-used BBs... u_u
.::MAX::. - March 10, 2005 05:58 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Tamer Brad @ Mar 10 2005, 02:19 AM) |
| Nobody complained when they re-used BBs... u_u |
I do, most of the gimmicks in the gimmick specialty series are the same, the changing tip.
Composer of Requiems - March 12, 2005 11:52 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (.::MAX::. @ Mar 10 2005, 05:58 PM) |
| QUOTE (Tamer Brad @ Mar 10 2005, 02:19 AM) | | Nobody complained when they re-used BBs... u_u |
I do, most of the gimmicks in the gimmick specialty series are the same, the changing tip.
|
Battle Change core, Shooter Change Core Alpha and Shooter Change Core Gamma has an almost identical internal structure. However, they have extremely different function. Thus, I conclude that it cannot be considered to be a reused part. Furthermore, these are cores. However, user "Tamer Brad" has stated specifically "BB" which refers to Blade Base. This should not be confused with "RC", which is commonly refers to Running Core in the HMS context.
.::MAX::. - March 12, 2005 03:16 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Composer of Requiems @ Mar 12 2005, 05:52 AM) |
| QUOTE (.::MAX::. @ Mar 10 2005, 05:58 PM) | | QUOTE (Tamer Brad @ Mar 10 2005, 02:19 AM) | | Nobody complained when they re-used BBs... u_u |
I do, most of the gimmicks in the gimmick specialty series are the same, the changing tip.
|
Battle Change core, Shooter Change Core Alpha and Shooter Change Core Gamma has an almost identical internal structure. However, they have extremely different function. Thus, I conclude that it cannot be considered to be a reused part. Furthermore, these are cores. However, user "Tamer Brad" has stated specifically "BB" which refers to Blade Base. This should not be confused with "RC", which is commonly refers to Running Core in the HMS context.
|
I think he meant running core.
Composer of Requiems - March 12, 2005 03:31 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (.::MAX::. @ Mar 12 2005, 03:16 PM) |
| QUOTE (Composer of Requiems @ Mar 12 2005, 05:52 AM) | | QUOTE (.::MAX::. @ Mar 10 2005, 05:58 PM) | | QUOTE (Tamer Brad @ Mar 10 2005, 02:19 AM) | | Nobody complained when they re-used BBs... u_u |
I do, most of the gimmicks in the gimmick specialty series are the same, the changing tip.
|
Battle Change core, Shooter Change Core Alpha and Shooter Change Core Gamma has an almost identical internal structure. However, they have extremely different function. Thus, I conclude that it cannot be considered to be a reused part. Furthermore, these are cores. However, user "Tamer Brad" has stated specifically "BB" which refers to Blade Base. This should not be confused with "RC", which is commonly refers to Running Core in the HMS context.
|
I think he meant running core.
|
I think, you were not there the last time he brought it up. Specific examples during that discussion were SG Flat, SG Semi-Flat and SG Sharp.
In addition, the cores of GS series function very differently. Please don't overgeneralize. There is a very important distinction between timed mode change, change upon impact, change upon launch, etc.
