Title: BioRights Declaration
Description: A good one?
Ancient Races - May 3, 2004 08:33 AM (GMT)
Dear fellow-UNmembers,
Please tell me what you think of the latest UN-resolution: "BioRights Declaration"!
Personal view of The Ancient One (Paul): We vote AGAINST, since we are against cloning of humans in the first place..
P.S. The Principality of Nicaea has expressed it's view on this resolution in a PT: AGAINST.
Annoyastan - May 3, 2004 10:27 AM (GMT)
International Terrans - May 3, 2004 02:01 PM (GMT)
International Terrans has voted AGAINST this resolution - cloning itself destroys the sanctity of human life, let alone giving them the same rights as those of real people.
The only thing clones are good for is cannon fodder.
We encourage all nations to radically oppose such libertarian, life-abusing pap.
The Bulgarite - May 3, 2004 02:30 PM (GMT)
Daimyo Oda Nobunaga - May 3, 2004 04:05 PM (GMT)
farhad - May 3, 2004 07:41 PM (GMT)
we vote For the resolution.
Tolomakia - May 4, 2004 11:12 AM (GMT)
Ancient Races - May 5, 2004 08:56 PM (GMT)
The current 'score' is 4 For - 4 Against. Anyone else wants to express it's views?
Cypriot Socialist Federation - May 6, 2004 11:20 AM (GMT)
International Terrans - May 6, 2004 02:19 PM (GMT)
Think of a painting. Is a copy worth the same as the original? NO! It is not the original, and is not of the same quality! If you want more people, throw in baby bonuses or make abortion illegal.
NOTE: Please excuse my ranting.
The Bulgarite - May 6, 2004 02:47 PM (GMT)
How exacty is a painting comparable to a living being?
International Terrans - May 7, 2004 12:36 AM (GMT)
It isn't. But if we have problems with messing around with human life, then we shouldn't be cloning in the first place. Animals? Fine. Humans? Lets just avoid that altogether - don't do it!
